NaturalStrength.com is an online think-tank, dedicated to truthful drug-free strength training information, (weight training, weightlifting, olympic lifting, powerlifting, competitive strongman, bodybuilding, physical culture & iron game). Good articles about weight training, strength research, the harmful effects of steroids, the mental aspects of training, and iron game - physical culture history are always wanted. Email articles to the editor: bobwhelan@naturalstrength.com
Saturday, August 23, 2014
Get a Grip - By Randy Roach
A Magnificent Grip on Pulldowns! - By Randy Roach
industry, I had for some time come to believe that there really wasn’t
anything all that new and exciting in the realm of resistance strength
training. Many gizmos, most of little use, had come and gone over the
decades. The tried and true muscle building tools that emerged from the
pioneering gyms of the 20th century slowly anchored themselves through time
into the hearts of the hardcore lifters, especially with improvements via
advanced engineering and expanding technologies. Rarely at this point after
years of tuning this equipment do you encounter innovation of any real
noteworthiness, let alone a revolutionary evolution in design. Rarely.
In early spring of 2014 I was sharing with former Natural Mr. USA, Josh
Trentine, about these beautifully built neutral and angled grip full Olympic
size barbells manufactured by Tim Fitzpatrick of TGrip Barbell
(www.tgrip.com). I was also updating him on some new triceps and lat
pulldown bars I had just purchased. Regarding my cable bars he simply
emailed, "I hate to break the news but I have something that's going to ruin
all of your other lat bars forever. Enjoy while you can." I more or less
brushed off his statement as exaggeration, but Josh typically wasn't prone
to such assertions without just cause so he did pique my interest.
Nonetheless, in the back of my mind I did believe I was going to experience
just another pulldown bar that would be relegated to a growing collection
which was slowly migrating into my fruit cellar.
Coincidently, during that exact time I had been conversing with a seasoned
trainer, Leon Sohn out of St Louis, Missouri. We had been discussing each
other’s equipment preferences extensively for hours. Out of appreciation,
Leon generously purchased for me as a gift what he referred to as a "MAG"
bar which again was yet another pull-down bar probably destined for my fruit
cellar - or so I believed.
Surprisingly, the bar arrived rather quickly considering that it had to cross
the Canadian border . The first thing that I noticed was that this so-
called "MAG" bar did not resemble anything like I expected. The traditional
lat pulldown bar has decades of visual recognition and most probably
wouldn't even know what the MAG bar was or what to do with it. Being
blind coupled with the fact that there wasn't a single piece of round bar to
grip took me a moment to properly orientate the apparatus and figure out
just what exactly I was holding on to.
What I did have in my possession was a Maximum Advantage Grip (MAG) pulldown
bar manufactured by Tom Barton of Barton Innovations. The hand grips were
definitely very unique. As mentioned, this MAG bar had no standard round
bars to grasp and I was immediately enticed to go downstairs to the gym and
see how it felt and how it performed in action. Leon had sent me one of seven bars
with his choice being Tom's medium width (22"), neutral grip (palms facing
each other) bar.
The movement was amazing! The Maximum Advantage Grip was able to actually
place more emphasis on the back muscularture by diminishing the use of the
arms. The bodybuilders of old use to get close to this by wrapping their
palms and thumbs up high on the standard round bar, but Tom had successfully
nailed this down with his unique MAG bar grip. The best way to describe the
handles would be a total palm oriented grip somewhat like pulling on the
edges of two specially contoured 2” by 6" pieces of lumber. I immediately
moved the bar over to my cable row whereupon I received the same feel of a
very strong grip again minimizing arm action, thus placing more on the
targeted back muscles. I was very impressed to say the least. This bar was
fantastic! It literally adds yet another dimension by becoming a union
between body and machine as a very intuitive lady client of mine pointed
out:
The bar simply felt good and was a natural extension of my body rather than
a bar I was wrestling with. The bar assisted me in doing the movement and
in achieving my weight/rep goal. I thought less about 'form' and was able
to experience the feeling of success and motivation to do more.
I immediately emailed Leon thanking him for this awesome gift. I had no
idea what the bar cost nor did I care. I took a chance the next day which
was a Saturday to contact by phone Barton Innovations. I was surprised when
Tom himself picked up and took the call on what I figured would be his day
off. I wanted to tell him how enamored I was with his bar and that I wanted
the remaining six bars regardless of cost. In my opinion, his products are
very reasonably priced considering the technology, quality, and
functionality compounded with his steadfast stance on personally
manufacturing in the United States, which also appealed to me
philosophically.
Tom Barton is a veteran in the Iron Game industry with a background in
powerlifting going back to the 1970s. When I asked how he came up with the
idea for his amazing grips he told me that way back he wondered why he could
do more pull ups when jumping up and performing them off roof rafters than
when grabbing a standard round bar. The concept and products began their
physical evolution beginning in 1985 and he patented his intellectual
property in 1996. His bars experienced some variations before he settled on
the current models in 2009.
As mentioned, Leon had sent me the medium width, neutral grip MAG bar. I
received two more bars from Tom Barton with the medium width (22” from middle
finger to middle finger) one with a pronated (overhand) grip and the other
with a supinated (underhanded)) grip. Both those grips were pronated and
supinated 45 degrees off a straight bar. Tom also sent me three bars with
the exact same grips but narrower having a width of 5" between middle
fingers. The seventh and final bar was a 38" wide pronated grip.
All seven bars were bang on even the two I was skeptical about, both the
wide and narrow pronated grips. I just wasn't fully confident of those
widths for that grip orientation. However, Tom obviously knew his business
as both bars are amazing with the narrow version being probably the favorite
for most who have tried them all at my facility thus far.
Unfortunately it has become very difficult to express true sincerity over
the quality and functionality of an excellent product line in an industry
long over-saturated with such extensive hyperbole. It seems as though
anything new entering the game is now accompanied with marketing hype so
over-the-top it can often surpass skepticism, leaving one nauseated.
Nevertheless with that said, I am more than willing to stake whatever
credibility I have by stating that Tom Barton's MAG bars really are that
good!
With his numerous years in the business, Leon Sohn had a similar disposition
as myself:
I first saw the Mag bar on Dante Trudel's popular Dog Crap website,
Intensemuscle.com. I am very skeptical about claims and view most of what
I read as just excessive 'marketing.' I honestly was not expecting it to be
anything except a substitute once in a while for my conventional handles.
When I received one of the bars and used it I was totally jazzed. It works
so much better than a regular attachment. I was very happy that it exceeded
my expectations.... by a lot!! Best cable attachments on the market in my
opinion!
When I then asked Josh Trentine if he had heard of the MAG bars it was in
fact these very bars he was referring to and he had planned to bring them from Ohio for
me to experience. Again, he was emphatic in his own promotion by stating,
“The bars are genius. Best bars I’ve ever used...Everything else ever is a
waste next to those!" Josh is not only a champion bodybuilder, he is an
equipment expert and manufacturer who also happens to be a physiotherapist.
The ergonomics of the MAG bars inspired Josh to write an extensive article
on exercise movement synergy and its relationship to these wonderful tools
from Barton Innovations.
Tom Barton is well on his way in successfully accomplishing the formable
task of usurping the long standard rowing and pulldown tools with his
Maximum Advantage Grip bars. Everyone who tries his products will want them
and it is simply a matter of time before his bars are pulling weight stacks
in thousands of gyms worldwide. You might say that Tom is inevitably
building a MAGnificent grip on the strength and muscle building industry.
See his products at www.maxagrip.com.
Randy Roach,
Trainer and author of “Muscle, Smoke & Mirrors"
Thursday, May 5, 2011
Is Bodybuilding a Dirty Word? - By Randy Roach
In most social circles, say the word “bodybuilding” and you will draw reactions rivaling that of a racially-charged verbal epithet. Really, is there any other physical endeavour that possesses such a vast schism or contradiction between the essence of the craft and the way it is played out at the top competitive levels today? The look of the modern day bodybuilder has little support from the public or from its own industry, yet many of their tools are still used by millions worldwide to improve physical appearance, fitness, and as a training adjunct for enhanced sports-performance.
Believe it or not, there was actually a time in a by-gone era when the look of the bodybuilder was more highly sought since its participants were believed to be practicing Physical Culture. They were a breed of strongmen who demonstrated their strength, displayed their physiques, and wrote books and pamphlets on how to live a healthy lifestyle. The most prominent of these pioneering bodybuilders was late 19th century vaudeville performer, Eugen Sandow.
Even Alan Calvert, founder of Milo Barbell, said almost 100 years ago that for every 1 man who wanted to be strong like Eugen Sandow, he would show you 100 who wanted to look like him. Antithetical to this philosophy was the most powerful man in American weightlifting through the 20th century, Bob Hoffman. Bob didn’t like the notion of building muscle simply for display purposes: he wanted them to perform. Although he wanted those muscles to execute primarily the 3 Olympic lifts (clean and jerk, press, and snatch), he was an early advocate of using weightlifting for improvement in other fields of athletics back in the 1930s. For example, he credited weightlifting for his own success in aquatic sports.
As mentioned, since a good number of early 20th century strongmen performers and weightlifters possessed impressive physiques, weightlifting and bodybuilding do in fact share some common historical roots. The entwinement continued when the AAU (Amateur Athletic Union), the most powerful amateur sports governing body in America up until 1978, began officially sanctioning bodybuilding contests, specifically the Mr. America event in 1939. The contests were tagged to the National Weightlifting Championships and thus pinned under the thumb of Bob Hoffman who was a very powerful figure within the AAU. Although the Mr. America entrants were not required to participate in the AAU weightlifting contest, they were still under the watchful eye of Hoffman who favoured any contestant who possessed a weightlifting background.
The argument between “muscles for show” versus “muscles for go” inevitably led to the decades-long debate over whether bodybuilding was pageant or sport. Bob Hoffman wasn’t alone in his concern over bodybuilding becoming a totally autonomous adventure. Iron Man magazine publisher, Peary Rader, shared Hoffman’s fear over the physique stars mutating into what he called “strutting egotists.” With the influence of both men within the AAU, the Mr. America contest was judged for many years not simply on muscularity and proportion, but equally on general appearance and athletic ability. Although the general appearance points were to carry only 25 percent of the scoring, many felt it was used far too much as the deciding factor as to who would wear the coveted Mr. America crown.
The pageant/sport debate wasn’t the only issue forging the dichotomous craft of bodybuilding. Many a sport traversed their share of evolutionary hurdles to survive and grow through the years when sport did not receive the recognition it does today. That began to change from the 1960s onward. The dynamics between corporate America and the world of athletics changed dramatically as technology altered the landscape of social economics.
Both the athlete and the sport became supercharged commercially and would receive a level of recognition never experienced before. Even competitive bodybuilding enjoyed its years of glitter during the 1970s and 1980s, but the awkward sport just seemed to encounter bigger hurdles, serving only to heighten its self-contradiction.
Technology didn’t stop with facilitating an explosion in sports media through television; It offered advancements in many of the hardware tenets of the various games. From the playing fields, ice surfaces, and combat rings, to the bats, pucks, balls, and protective gear, industrial engineering was carving new markets in the arena of athletics.
Bodybuilding and the fitness industry certainly benefited from these advancements considering the myriad of more complex machinery that entered both fields, from Harold Zinkin’s Universal machine to Arthur Jones’s Nautilus invasion and all its derivatives that followed over the years.
Along with the resistance equipment, the evolution of bodybuilding through the 20th century did in fact contribute much to the birth and growth of the enormous fitness industry. Through its more natural years, the bodybuilders themselves offered a look desired both openly and secretly by many. However, this ended when they chemically morphed themselves beyond any cultural context.
It was this more dubious use of pharmaceutical technology that further disassociated bodybuilding from the general public. Yes, baseball, football, wrestling, and track and field have all come under scrutiny regarding the use of anabolic steroids by their athletes, but it is the top competitive bodybuilders who became the walking billboards for chemical abuse. In their blind pursuit of sheer, lean muscle size, the drug arsenal these men have engaged has become mind-boggling! Some of their antics have made a mockery of the sport and fall in line with what could more suitably be referred to as, “bodystuffing.”
Compounding and further exacerbating the dilemma has been the decades-long association of a questionable sexuality with the bodybuilders. Avoiding the controversy surrounding that topic, it is unfortunate that these antics, accusations and the resulting outlandish appearance of the top physique competitors have become tightly identified with bodybuilding. Some in the industry have begun to refer to this aberrant faction of the sport in other terms, thus allowing the craft of bodybuilding to return more towards its original Physical Culture roots. So then, just who are the real bodybuilders? It has always been deceptively simple. Any individual, athlete or laymen, who partakes in resistance training with the intent to change the appearance of their body and to improve their well-being is, in essence, a true Body Builder. Not such a dirty word, is it?
Randy Roach is the author of the 3-volume book series, “Muscle, Smoke & Mirrors.” The project entails a comprehensive history of bodybuilding and all its relative issues such as diet, weightlifting, fitness, drugs, and even global politics which took five years to complete through extensive interviews, research and analysis. There is a heavy emphasis on nutrition as it relates historically to the fitness industry and the general public. Volume I was released in June of 2008 at 562 pages. Volume II is expected in late 2011. Reaction to Volume I has been extremely favourable with endorsements coming from both the general reader and professionals in the field. David Epstein of Sports Illustrated has commented on the “unbelievably extensive research.” Many facets of this intriguing history are reveled for the first time, not to mention an amazing cast of characters whose diets, philosophies and even idiosyncrasies alone make good reading.
Randy is a retired computer programmer who spent over 15 years developing systems in both the museum and environmental engineering professions. He has written and been published in 3 different fields. Randy now makes his living as an author and private health and training consultant in his home in Ontario, Canada. He can be reached through his website www.randyroach.ca where you may also view the amazing feedback for Volume I of the “Muscle, Smoke & Mirrors” project. This website will allow the purchase of Volume I through Author House.
This site does not provide medical advice. We assume no liability for the information provided in NaturalStrength articles. Please consult your physician before beginning any exercise or nutrition program. Copyright © 1999-2026 NaturalStrength.com | All Rights Reserved.
