Sunday, May 10, 2009

ENDURANCE by Earle E. Liederman - Author and Publisher, (1926), - Chapter 11

Exercises of endurance are those in which the work must be continued for a considerable length of time. In these exercises the total expenditure of force is determined more by the duration than by the intensity or resistance, and rapidity of succession of the efforts. It is essential that the muscular effort should not be too great and the movements not too rapid, otherwise fatigue in some of its various forms may interrupt the movements too soon. An exercise of endurance is only a moderate exercise if performed for a short time, but it may become forced exercise if it is continued too long. in these exercises the amount of work accomplished after a long time, even at the end of the day, for instance, may be very great; but the expenditure of force is made in such small fractions that there is no painful muscular effort at any movement; neither is there any marked disturbance in the functions of involved organs.

However, you may be able, in performing an exercise of endurance, to work up to the point, without knowing it, of making the exercise equivalent to heavy muscular work. When the limit of your own natural capacity is not exceeded, there is no noticeable disturbance created in the body. For the reason that in endurance work there is perfect balance between the muscular exertion and the power of resistance, you are able to go on working for a long time, allowing the useful effects of your exercising to accumulate, without causing any disturbance to the various organs or to the muscles used in the performance.

It is my opinion that a movement may be classed under endurance work even though it takes but fifteen or twenty minutes to reach the point of fatigue, and a light movement may be considered endurance work if it can be kept up for hours at a time. The two really blend and, of course, depend upon the strength and ability of the athlete. I consider that the one who chins himself forty to fifty times without stopping performs just as distinct an endurance movement as does the one who runs or swims a mile without resting.

Again, the object of this book is to enable everyone to save his own life; and I contend that heavy endurance work will prove just as valuable in this regard as will light endurance movements. If you are capable of climbing hand over hand up a long rope, say for one hundred feet, you can rest assured such a stunt and test of your muscles will be just as valuable to you as if you were able to swim one mile or to run two or three miles. Of course, if it is a specialty that you are interested in, such as becoming a long distance swimmer or a long distance runner or a twenty-five-round boxer, then whether you are able to chin yourself fifteen times or fifty times will make but little difference.

It is not my object to instruct anyone in any special line, nor to select any line of activity for anyone. If your ambition is to become a long distance runner you easily can obtain instructions and advice elsewhere. But, if, for example, you are unable to run more than fifty or one hundred yards without becoming fatigued and breathless, then the information I am endeavoring to impart, and the condition I am trying to interest you to acquire through this medium will prove valuable.

Have you ever noticed an athlete warming up just before a decisive event? This is noticed especially in track work; but if you have been observant in the gymnasium also, you may have noticed some prominent strong man going through a series of light calisthenic movements just before attempting heavier work. He is consciously getting his muscles supple and in condition for the necessary heavier exertions. This also can be done without direct intentional effort, as in long distance running when in endeavoring to cut down the time of the run one takes a trifle longer strides or runs with greater rapidity. The thought of winning acts as a stimulus and increases the speed and stride without any direct forced action of the will on the part of the athlete.

A person whose body is run down and weakened from lack of use, or a person who is recovering from a sickness will be greatly benefitted by endurance work. It is like giving food in fractional amounts to a convalescent. If upon recovering from a serious illness you were to eat a hearty meal, serious complications might arise, for when the digestions has been weakened and the requirements lessened by disease the food must be resumed in exceedingly small amounts and the amount increased very slowly. To give a weak person the amount of exercise at one period (if he were capable of doing it) that he would be doing after faithfully following athletic activities for many months would be fatal; but to start him with light endurance work of slow rhythm would enable him to receive the same value from the lighter exercise that the strong man receives from his heavy weights. In other words, the light endurance work to the feeble man is of just as much benefit as lifting heavy dumb-bells is to the weight lifter.

Therefore, the larger your muscles become and the stronger you become, the harder you must work in order to progress. A physical culturist usually has no difficulty in obtaining from a fourteen-inch to a sixteen-inch upper arm, depending, of course, upon his height; but it would be a most difficult matter for him to add another inch to this arm after he has been exercising for a y ear or two. The beginner, in performing one-tenth or less of the work done by the experienced athlete, derives just as much benefit, so far as girth increase and functional benefits are concerned, from his light endurance exercises as the experienced man receives from his greater work. Of course, as he becomes stronger he would get nowhere were he to continue with the same light endurance exercises. As he becomes stronger, organically and muscularly, he must progress accordingly in his type or degree of exercise or in both.

Endurance work must be divided into fractional quantities sufficiently small to enable the body to support each exercise dose without disturbing its normal functions. Also, the muscular efforts must be at sufficiently long intervals that the effect of the second effort may not be added directly to that of the first. Stated differently, there must be a long enough pause between each two movements to give the muscles and general energy a chance to recuperate. If there is not, the work instead of being endurance work, becomes muscle-building and, perhaps, in feeble cases, forced exercising.

As I have mentioned previously, the best example of endurance and of relaxation is the heart. It pumps all through life, but between beats there is enough pause to enable the heart muscle to recover. When the heart is overworked by being required to pump faster and harder than under normal conditions, it has insufficient time in which to rest between beats. Through such over-exertion the athlete gets what is called “athletic heart,” and sometimes one or more leaking valves.

In an exercise of strength there is an accumulation of work, because each muscular effort is very evident, and one follows another before the full effect of the preceding has been entirely overcome. In an exercise of speed there is a multiplication of work, because of the rapid succession of efforts of small intensity. This leads in the end to an accumulation of work. In exercises of endurance the efforts, being repeated at sufficiently spaced intervals, are fractional, if at any time the amount of work performed does not exceed the power of resistance—though the final result is an accumulation of work, also.

An exercise of endurance is characterized by the necessity for perfect balance between the force of the muscular effort and the power of resistance in the body. It is difficult to determine just when an exercise is one of endurance when the work is not carried on in competition and does not become prolonged owing to destination—as in running, walking, swimming, etc. The same exercise may be classed in turn endurance, speed or strength exercise, according to the conditions under which it is performed. For instance if you row in competition the work becomes speed work; whereas, if you row over a long course, mile after mile, it becomes endurance work. Rowing in very heavy seas takes on the form of strength work, just as walking, which is a type of endurance exercise, becomes strength work when you walk up-stairs or up-hill.

In other words, if you bring on fatigue too rapidly, it may be muscle-building, speed, or strength work and not endurance work; but if fatigue does not manifest itself and the work can go on continuously for long periods of time, it then is endurance work. Thus it is the conditions under which you perform the exercise that determine its character.

But individual conditions, of training, strength, wind, and nervous energy, have much to do with determining the type of exercise, also. There is nothing so variable as the power of resistance within different people. What is an exercise of strength or speed for one becomes endurance for another who has had much exercising experience. Taking rowing again for illustration, this is an exercise of strength to the man who is learning, for in a short time he is out of breath; but to the experienced oarsman who spends much of his time on the water it becomes endurance work, for he can keep it up all day without fatiguing.

Generally, the difference in the power of resistance, or the staying power, as it also may be called, of different people is due largely to the difference in their respiratory powers. It might be said that one’s respiratory fitness is the true regulator of all work of endurance. A person whose rib-box is narrow would not stand the same chance in competition as one who rib-box is broad. In the former, the lungs are not as large, nor have they the room to expand; whereas not only is the lung capacity greater in the one whose rib-box is wide but his endurance powers excel in direct proportion.

There are two conditions, then, necessary to form an exercise of endurance. The first is a certain moderation in the force of the exercises. The second is a certain power of resistance on the part of the body. Therefore, stamina or staying power applies rather to the qualities of a man than it concerns the nature of the work he performs. A work of endurance is one in which the method of performance enables one to continue it for a long time; and the man with staying power is one whose body is fit to support prolonged work. Some people are unable to perform the most moderate exercise without showing, after a very short time, the signs of extreme fatigue. There are others who keep up, with astonishing powers of resistance, the most violent work; and, as I said, for them the exercise of strength of speed becomes merely an exercise of endurance.

While at a summer resort one day I noticed from my window a man skipping a rope on a platform which had been placed on the sand. This rope skipping is done by every little girl in her early childhood days; and it also is indulged in by athletes, for it is very beneficial for the wind and the muscles below the knee. It was about ten o’clock in the morning when I first saw this man skipping the rope. I watched him for a few minutes and then went about my daily duties. Around noon-time I again saw him skipping the rope, and learned to my astonishment, upon investigation, that he had been skipping the rope continuously for those two hours. It was remarkable that he could do so practically without a miss, and still more remarkable that his lungs and heart were in such a phenomenal condition as to function properly while withstanding the obvious and necessary exertion. Jumping off the ground, no matter how lightly it is done, affects the heart and respiratory organs considerably, and it must have taken much practice for this man to be able to continue this one form of exercise for so long a time. I know I shouldn’t have the patience to do it. However, it surely was a marvelous display of endurance.

But place a rope in the hands of the beginner and ask him to skip for five minutes; and, even though he possess the technique and can perform without a miss, he will find that his exertions will bring on breathlessness with such rapidity and tiring of the muscles of his calves and shins so quickly that to him the work, for the short time it would be possible, would be muscle-building.

Rope skipping is an excellent exercise for creating endurance, both in the muscles below the knee and in your staying power or wind. For the beginner, rope skipping may prove a violent exercise; but after practice and to the experienced physical culturist it becomes endurance work. If after an exercise you experience neither fatigue nor breathlessness, you have been performing endurance movements, and you may consider yourself fit for that work. If, instead, you are winded and any part of your body is tired, you have been performing violent exertions. This is one way to distinguish violent exercising from endurance work or gentle exercise—for endurance consists of taking exercise as easily as possible. By continuing the movement for a longer time than usual, fatigue and breathlessness will occur in endurance work; but it will come on more slowly and gradually than in the performance of violent exercise.

In order that you may perform an exercise that may be continued for a long time, the first condition is that it does not lead to breathlessness. You can go on walking, for example, in spite of weary legs and sore feet; but you cannot go on running when you are out of breath. Certain parts of the body naturally possess more endurance than others. This, of course, becomes localized. For instance, the fingers and hands naturally have more endurance than have the shoulders or the back. We are continually using the fingers and hands in our everyday life; therefore, they seem almost wholly immune to fatigue. Observing the pianist at the motion picture theatre who continues playing throughout the various continuous performances, you often wonder why he does not become exhausted. True, he has periods of relaxation; but his fingers are capable of continuing their light endurance efforts much longer than would the muscles of his arms and shoulders.

The muscles around the jaw seem to possess tireless endurance qualities, especially in those whom we often observe who are continually chewing gum. Not long ago there was a public speaker who continued talking, without a let-up, for forty-eight hours, while I often have gotten tired after talking ten or fifteen minutes. My experience has taught me to say little and listen more, and I presume that is the reason I notice the effort of speaking more than do the public speakers and many others.

If you attempt any exercise or movement of endurance, it is essential that you eliminate all extra effort from the action. The absence of effort saves you from the violent exertion of the heart and blood vessels which hinders the working of these organs. The object of endurance exercise, therefore, is to spare the organs as much as possible, and it is most essential to give the body the chance to repair even during the work. In this way breathlessness will not occur during exercises of endurance. By such care the quantity of carbonic acid produced by the activity of the muscles never rises to a quantity in excess of that which the lungs can eliminate, but it is removed from the blood as fast as it is formed and passes unnoticed from the body. It is possible to escape breathlessness while performing endurance work only by introducing considerable oxygen into the body by way of the respiratory system.

Proper training, therefore, is the first step towards acquiring endurance. The object of training is to fit you as completely and as quickly as possible for the performance of a given work. In other words, it is preparation. Again, training has other meaning besides muscular activities. A diver may be trained in holding his breath longer. Jockies are trained to make them lighter so as to lighten the work of the horses that carry them. Hence, in order to continue being in the condition in which training puts you, it is necessary to keep up that training, in considerable degree, at least. Otherwise you simply go back to about where you were when you started.

It is well always to keep in good condition, though I do not believe in being “on edge,” so to speak, at all times. By this I mean that if you were training for a contest, such as boxing, wrestling or running, it would be a waste of nervous force to continue day after day the condition that you should be in for the contest. If this condition is kept up one becomes stale, and staleness demands a rest.

Getting and keeping in good condition does not necessarily mean the loss of weight, unless, of course, superfluous flesh exists upon your body. Once you have eliminated excess fatty tissue, you will not lose weight by moderate training. You will further lose, however, if you are over-training and, as I said before, continually keyed up to the highest pitch. An athlete who once becomes muscular, even though he were thin before he indulged in physical culture work, generally will accumulate fat if he discontinues his training and relaxes, just as the fat man who reduces to symmetrical proportions will quickly resume his old-time pudgy figure if he discontinues his exercise. of course, there will be a falling off in the contour and size of the muscles, and fatty tissue will accumulate around the most inactive parts, such as the waistline and hips.

The thin individual reacts somewhat differently. He usually continues to take on more weight as his muscles increase in size, but should he stop training he not only would rapidly lose an inch or more from his thighs and arms, but he would increase an inch or more around his torso and especially around the waist.

I tried an experiment myself a few years ago on the effect of prolonged relaxation. As you know, I am an advocate of daily exercise, and I practice what I preach; but for an experiment on this occasion I suddenly dropped off training and did nothing for three weeks. Now my waist measured thirty inches before ending my training; but upon the completion of the three weeks’ rest it measured thirty-six, and I had the devil’s own time getting it back again to thirty-two inches, where it has remained, refusing to become any smaller; and, of course, I in turn refuse to allow it to become any larger. While in training my upper arm measured sixteen and one-half inches. After the three weeks of relaxation it measured fifteen and three-quarter inches. My thigh measured twenty-three and one-half inches, and after my lay-off, strange to say, it increased to twenty-four inches. The girth of my chest gained one inch during my period of inactivity.

During this period of rest I was not my normal self organically and mentally. I felt sluggish and lost considerable physical ambition, and it was very hard to start into exercising again. This is the only time I have experimented in this way, and I can assure you that I have no desire to do it again; for I have found that there is nothing equal to keeping fit at all times and in such a condition that it requires but a day or two of extra training to fit you for any contest.

Professional boxing offers an interesting example of training methods. Usually it takes about six weeks of preparation for a fighter to fit himself for a contest, and upon the evening of the contest his muscles and nerves are keyed up to the highest point of responsiveness. If after the bout he were asked to continue his active training, he soon would find himself stale, both mentally and physically—mentally, perhaps, because there would be no incentive for him to keep it up, and physically, because of the drain upon his body. Fighters, you know, perform considerable endurance work and often spend from two to three hours a day at their work-out. Therefore, relaxation after a contest is necessary, and in most cases fighters add considerable weight during their periods of inactivity.

I believe in carrying from three to five pounds of extra weight on my body at all times, as it gives me something to work off—something to feed on, so to speak. If a boxer continued his daily endurance training right up to the day of the contest, he would be apt to find himself stale during the encounter. That is why fighters usually relax on the day the bout is to take place. This gives the muscles the relaxation necessary before their final exertion. It would be well for anyone who train for a contest, whether it be boxing, wrestling, rowing, running or what not, to follow the fighter’s program by relaxing and avoiding all physical activities on the day of the event. The object of training is to develop your muscular and nervous energy and to increase your power of resisting fatigue. If you have no secured these effects by training before the last day it is occur frequently and regularly at all times; the muscles quite certain that you cannot develop it on the last day.

As I have mentioned so many times, relaxation should be given brief periods of rest after each movement in order to recuperate properly for another exertion. How would you expect to run a mile or more if you ran the first hundred yards at top speed? And how would you expect to box twenty rounds if at the sound of the gong in the opening round you exerted yourself by boxing at top speed? You may be able to go at top speed during part of any contest; but the time for this is well along in the contest after slower work allowing some degree of relaxation, which permits the vital organs and muscles to reach their highest degree of harmonious action.

In violent exercising, fatigue and breathlessness come on quite suddenly, yet they leave you more quickly than do the fatigue and breathlessness produced by the performance of endurance work. I have seen swimmers come out of the water, after swimming a couple of miles, and although they were breathing somewhat above normal they were not as winded as sprinters I have seen who have gone but one hundred yards through the waters. As a rule, sprinting swimmers upon completion of their destination are quite winded, yet after a short period of rest they would be able to make another sprint. But an endurance swimmer would not have any inclination to get into the water soon for another long swim after the completion of one endurance test. This is because his fatigue has come on gradually, and is more general and more lasting than the fatigue of the sprinter. You can experience these reactions yourself; and, after all, you will find experience the best teacher.

I have watched the performances of Joe and Adolph Nordquest, the two brothers from Ashtabula, Ohio, who are noted for their strength performances. I have had the pleasure of seeing Joe put up with the left hand overhead, three hundred and one pounds, creating a new world’s record for the left arm bent press. It was interesting to note how he walked around the long bar-bell about a dozen times before he attempted to touch it. He was working himself up to physical and mental pitch in order to successfully perform the lift. After raising the bell overhead with one arm and dropping it to the floor the exhalation of his breath sounded like a bellows, so forcibly did it come out of his lungs. He was quite winded from the exertion; yet after only a minute or two he was fully capable of attempting other lifts.

I watched his brother Adolph lift a huge bar-bell, two hands overhead, about ten or twelve times. This was done in a public performance, and the weight was announced as two hundred and fifty pounds. Knowing him personally, I inquisitively asked him, after the performance, what the actual weight of the bell was. Adolph in a whisper confided to me, at the same time asking me not to tell anyone, that the weight actually was only two hundred and forty-five pounds. It doesn’t seem very much to relate or to read; but anyone who cares to attempt to lift even a two hundred-pound bar-bell over his head ten times will appreciate the marvelous strength Adolph Nordquest possesses. But I am rambling from my subject. After completing the lifts his part in the performance was ended and he was quite winded; but I am sure he could have duplicated the whole thing after a minute or two of relaxation.

It will be of interest and value for you to have a little knowledge in the effects of exercises of strength. All exercises are in the same category. Strength work really blends with endurance work; because, as I have stated previously, what is endurance work for one is strength work for another. To the beginner, the lifting of a fifty-pound dumb-bell from the floor to arms’ length overhead would mean performing a feat of strength, while an athlete who did this movement before me three hundred and fifty times without stopping really performed an endurance test.

As related previously, I give a great many of my pupils in their first lesson the common push-up or floor dip exercise. This is quite a stunt for some of them to do, especially if they have never exercised before. But if I were to give this exercise to those who have had six or eight months or more of training they would consider it as simply a warming-up movement. I feel that everyone should perform strength work and continue with the strength movements until they become endurance repetitions. There is really no distinct line of separation between strength work and endurance work. They blend into each other; and it depends wholly on the individual whether the exercise or movement undertaken is one of strength or one of endurance.

The state of mind is an important factor in the performance of endurance work. During all training for endurance work your mind must be free from all mental disturbances and all depressing emotions. You must avoid all nervous excitement and all keen sensations, and, as I have previously stated, peace and harmony should prevail. One who train for endurance should not perform any violent exercise. Violent exercise need not necessarily mean a feat of strength or a different stunt; it may be a violent exertions that would bring on fatigue too rapidly; and fatigue should be avoided in training for endurance.

In the performance of heavy work, which may be classed as strength exercising, there are two important factors necessary—the straining of the muscles and the forcing of your will power. It is important, therefore, that you understand the value of nervous energy throughout these performances, as it plays a more important part than you may think.

I recall the great English weight lifter, Edward Aston, whose weight is around one hundred and sixty pounds; yet he has successfully lifted, one arm overhead, three hundred and one pounds in the bent press. I also recall the last time I met Anton Matysek, the phenomenal lifter of Baltimore, whose weight at the time was about one hundred and sixty-five pounds and yet he successfully lifted almost three hundred pounds in the bent press method, one hand overhead; and his other feats with the dumb-bells also have been remarkable. Each of these men weighed less than I do and a great many of their muscles are smaller in measurement than mine; and yet they are capable of lifting considerably more poundage than I have ever been able to lift. For me to bent press two hundred or two hundred and twenty-five pounds was quite a feat of strength; but to lift the same weight would have been merely play for Aston or Matysek. Undoubtedly, they possessed more nervous energy than I did when lifting the weights, and, of course, they have had considerable more practice with dumb-bells and bar-bells than I have had, for I very seldom use them. If I had practiced as faithfully with the weights as they had, perhaps I might have been in the same class with them; yet, I may not have been.

Variations in nervous energy may be manifested in a physical manner by a more or less evident stimulation of the muscles, which produces more or less powerful muscular contractions. Doubtless, this difference in nervous energy largely explains why two men of the same size and weight differ greatly in their feats of strength. But the exertion of a weight lifter endeavoring to lift an enormous weight from the ground overhead with two arms is no greater in proportion to strength possessed than it would be for the beginner to lift light weights or to chin himself for the first time.

To one who is accustomed to lifting weights it is an easy matter to pull himself up a rope hand over hand. While lifting weights may constitute violent exercises and feats of strength, it produces such strength that it makes rope climbing a mere test of endurance for the muscles involved. To one who is accustomed to curling a heavy bar-bell it is an easy matter to perform a great number of chins on a horizontal bar. Such rope climbing and chinning should be indulged in by everyone, for it may prove necessary sometime for saving your own life, though I hope not. The beginner who cannot chin himself once or dip between parallel bars more than two or three times is really in a regrettable state regarding his personal safety in the event of some dangers. The mere act of chinning himself once or dipping once or twice is, to him, really a feat of strength. Therefore, he should continue at such strength work until he is able to perform a number of repetitions, and after the repetitions become prolonged the work can be classed as endurance movements.

If an experienced athlete for the first time were to take a spade and dig a deep hole in the ground he would be performing strength movements, even though such labor would be endurance work for the working man. The athlete, whose muscles are used in certain ways and who is accustomed to fifteen or twenty minutes of exercising daily, would be working his muscles in a different manner in throwing over his shoulder spadefuls of dirt, and he would soon tire, just as the experienced weight lifter, who is sued to lifting enormous weights, would become tired very quickly while wielding the axe for chopping down a tree.

It depends on how the muscles are used whether the work is a movement of strength or a movement of endurance. The lumberjack who can swing the axe in cutting down tree after tree without fatigue and with scarcely a show of perspiration on his forehead, undoubtedly would make a poor showing at lifting dumb-bells or in running at top speed for any short distance. Also, he most likely would find himself breathless were he to cross-country trot for a mile or more. On the other hand, the sprinter or the cross-country runner soon would tire wielding the axe.

Therefore, strength movements and endurance movements are so closely associated that their type can be determined only by the condition and ability of the person performing them. Thus it can be seen that it is best for everyone to indulge in all forms of exercise, light and heavy; for the light work always can be accomplished with practice and with the development of the wind, while the heavy strength movements will develop into those of endurance, which light exercises cannot do.
Read More »

Saturday, May 9, 2009

Q & A - Strength Training for Self Defense/Martial Arts - By Bradley J. Steiner

Dear Professor Steiner,

What strength training program do you recommend for your self defense clients? Is it the same basic program and principles that you would give to most people or is there something different?

Thank you sir,

Scott Selvey



Hi Scott,

Thank you for your question.

You've pretty much guessed it, my friend! I urge all students of close combat and self-defense to follow an all round, basic weight training program. Working exercises in good form, and using weights that are heavy, but never too heavy to be properly manageable during exercise performance.

An example of the exercises I'd recommend (and any variations of these exercises, so long as they are basics, will do) are:

• A general body warmup — for example, one set of about eight floor-to-overhead pullups, or cleans and presses, or dumbell swings between the feet, etc. — using light weight.

• A basic curling exercise

• A basic press movement

• The squat (afraid there're no ways around this single exercise!)

• A bench press exercise

• A rowing movement

• Dead lifting (see comment for "squat", and note that a version of the dead lift that is close in every way to the stiff-legged style HOWEVER allowing for a SLIGHT flexion in the knees to protect the low back area from strain, is best)

• Leg raises with weight resistance (ie "iron boots" still work just fine for this exercise)

NOTE "A": I have indicated a program that anyone can do using the most basic weight training equipment. CHINNING, DIPPING, and the proper use of a LAT MACHINE and/or a LEG PRESS MACHINE, if such equipment is available, can be helpful — utilizing exercises with those items of equipment to add variety and interest to the program without sacrificing good, basic work for the major muscle groups.

If time, energy, and interest allow, there is nothing wrong with including lateral raises, shrugs, calf work, specific neck exercises, etc. ALL IN MODERATION AND ONLY WHEN/IF DEVELOPMENT, ENERGY, AND TIME ALLOWS. Otherwise, stick with core basics.

NOTE "B": Incorporating the excellent Nautilus Machines into programs so that free weights and the machines are employed together (if and when such machines are being taught and used correctly) is excellent.

NOTE "C": As for proper set/rep schemes I urge individuals to experiment a bit over time and find out what suits them best, individually. A good rule of thumb, in my experience, is: TWO or THREE sets, max, for general, all round development. Using 2 x 10 or 12, 2 x 8, 3x 6, 3 x 8, or using sets varying from light to heavy (ie 1 x 10, 1 x 8, and 1 x 6, etc.) might prove most efficient.

"How many workouts a week?" I recommend three on alternate days, and for many who train very hard three or more times weekly in martial arts, two workouts a week are plenty.

Be aware that physical training for all round development and improvement of skills performance will not replace PRACTICE OF THE SKILL. So never confuse the need to practice and to workout hard on TECHNIQUES with being interchangeable with the need to workout hard on DEVELOPMENTAL EXERCISES. I.e. A "hard practice session" does NOT eliminate the desirability of doing a "hard weight training workout". The two go hand in hand and have a reciprocally beneficial effect on each other; but they each serve a different purpose and must BOTH be followed assiduously as complimentary activities, for optimum results.

I hope that my reply has been of some help to you, and I wish you tremendous success in your personal training endeavors.

Best of luck to you, Scott!

Brad

Professor Steiner's American Combato Site
Read More »

Q & A - Recommended Book List - By Bradley J. Steiner

Dear Professor Steiner,

In the latest Sword and Pen there are some links to videos looking at the mindset of attackers/killers. I have looked at some of them and some of these people are just downright scary in their attitude. Also, a good article on the Yawara or hand stick.

However, my question is: Would you consider, (for a future issue), including some good links to free videos of combatives training/techniques information?

Thank You,

Keith.



Hi Keith,

Thank you for your question and for your nice comment about Sword & Pen. Much appreciated.

I must honestly confess that I have not perused YouTube for videos of combat skills to any serious degree. A year or so ago, on the recommendation of a friend, I checked a few "self-defense" videos on YouTube, but found them to be so ridiculous that I never went back. It is of course possible that there is some good material there, but I am unaware of it.

I would make this recommendation to you, before you attempt to search out video presentations on combat skills: Read and study the following books: 1. Kill or Get Killed, 2. All-In Fighting/GetTough!, 3. Cold Steel, 4. Hand-To-Hand Combat (U.S. Naval Institute), and 5. Bruce Tegnér's Complete Book of Self-Defense - and - Complete Book of Jukado. Each of the first four books is available in an inexpensive reprint edition from Paladin Press.
Tegnér's two books may be located in very inexpensive pocketbook editions.

If you'll make it your business to pore over those excellent works I think that you will have equipped yourself with the knowledge that you need to properly evaluate any video or other presentations of combat skills, regardless of who is presenting them. Then, you can go through whatever may appear on YouTube in that genre and be able to make an educated "yea" or "nay" as to its worth. Also, if you study those books and work at mastering what they teach, you'll need no DVD's - on YouTube or otherwise!

It will probably also be useful to you if you follow what is presented in Sword & Pen each month.

If you have seen - and paid attention to - several or more of those videos on violent gangs, etc. that were posted in Sword & Pen, then you know what sort of creatures your skills and mindset must prepare you for. When you check any written or DVD instruction on "self-defense", "close combat", "hand-to-hand fighting", etc. just ask yourself if what you're seeing and being taught therein is something that you feel you could employ instinctively in a sudden emergency, under adverse, real world conditions against such attackers.

I wish you good luck and success in your personal training, my friend!

Regards,

Brad

Professor Steiner's American Combato Site
Read More »

Q & A - Descriptive Martial Arts Time-line - By Bradley J. Steiner

Dear Professor Steiner,

This is actually a question from me that I will post on the site.

Could you please write us a descriptive Time-line of the history of what you consider to be the main branches of the various Martial Arts? (ie, Judo, Ju-Jitsu, Karate, Kung-Fu, Wrestling, Boxing, etc and how, where and when they started.) I've read that you said that they began in China. Right? I know this is a difficult and almost impossible to answer question.

Thanks a lot Brad for your time,

Bob



Dear Bob,

Thank you for your question, which I confess with all due humility, I am only able to answer in the most general way. What is more, my answer must, I'm afraid, be regarded more as personal opinion and surmise, rather than cold fact. (In my own defense, however, I will say that there is no one who could provide a genuinely accurate and thoroughly verifiable answer to your question. The truth is that there simply isn't sufficient documentation to be ironclad in an answer, and most experts disagree amongst and between themselves regarding the origins and development of the variety of martial arts - primarily Asian, it appears from your question - and their history).

It is actually my personal opinion, after studying and researching whatever information was available to me on the subject, that the body of combative doctrine broadly subsumed under the general heading of "Martial Arts of Asia" had its origins in China, Mongolia, India, and Tibet. Obviously, fighting per se cannot possibly be traced back precisely to any specific time, place, culture, epoch, or group, etc., however, the systematic organization of skills and their presentation as methods of grappling, striking, using weapons, etc. probably started thousands of years ago in one or more of those four places. Doubtless similar methods evolved over time in each of those four countries (which subsequently, and in myriad forms, styles, and variations, spread to Thailand, Japan, Korea, Burma, Okinawa, Indonesia, Vietnam, the Phillipines, Hawaii, etc.).

(Please note that I am not addressing the development of Western boxing and wrestling and pankration, all of which began in the early Greek and Roman societies. Nor am I addressing the development of the Western European martial arts [rapier and saber fighting, the battleaxe. quarterstaff work, la savate, and so on]. All of these are worthy arts, but it is a dizzying thing to attempt to organize a sweeping perspective on all of their origins, too, while trying at the same time to say something reaonably sensible about the Asian arts!

The most intricate, comprehensive, and sophisticated martial arts appear to me to have definitely come from China. China developed many edged, bludgeoning, throwing, and other types of personal weapons, as well grappling, striking, and combined grappling/striking methods. Very broadly, Chinese martial arts evolved along three lines:

1. Southern shaolin external "boxing" (ch'uan fa - popularly but incorrectly, "kung fu" or "gung fu") systems focusing primarily on hand techniques and employing rather low stances;

2. Northern shaolin external systems focusing on foot and leg methods, using high kicks, jumping and "flying" skills, and quite acrobatic maneuvers;

3. Internal systems (of which there are three main schools: T'ai Ch'i Ch'uan, Hsing Yi, and Pa Gua Ch'uan, and many dozens of off-shoots of each of these!).

There are - literally - hundreds of different styles of each of the above three broad categories.

India gave rise to many systems, perhaps the most notable is "varmannie" (although this is not by any means the only Indian martial art). Lathie (stickplay) is a highly developed Indian method, and there have been both Indian boxers and wrestlers of incredible acumen who (like the Great Gama, and others) distinguished themselves in a manner similar to the Western marvel, George Hackenschmidt. Indian martial arts have always been predominantly for self-defense, and the "heroes of the competition circuit" as it were, such as Gama, did not really focus on combat so much as on competition. The combatants stayed out of the limelight.

Japan derived nearly all of its martial heritage from China. "Chi chi su" was in fact the precursor to ju-jutsu, which as most know today was the martial art of the samurai. Every ju-jutsu technique and many, many more (often in more elegant and sophisticated form) can be found in such arts as developed thousands of years earlier, in China. It was largely the Southern Chinese ch'uan fa styles, as well as cheena adi and chi chi su, that came to Japan.

Korea derived considerable of its martial arts from China (the Northern ch'uan fa methods, predominantly) but also cultivated warrior arts and training methods of its own. Later on in Korean history - in the 20th century in fact - a Korean tang soo do expert studied one of the Japanese schools of ju-jutsu (aikijutsu) and, combining it with tang soo do, created hapkido. Koreans also cultivated their own form of judo (called "yudo" in Korea) which clearly derived from Jigoro Kano's Kodokan Judo. Judo and "Yudo" both are somewhat tamer forms of ju-jutsu.

Okinawa developed their karate systems based upon what the Okinawans had learned and observed from Chinese ch'uan fa experts who visited their country, and, peripherally, from snatches of ju-jutsu which were borrowed from the Japanese methods (the Japanese having occupied Okinawa, which is what gave rise to the extensive development of karate there). The Okinawans were powerful karate practitioners, and they were able to take from their Japanese conquerors some excellent tips about using ju-jutsu with their karate. Karate flourished in Okinawa largely as a means to fight the Japanese invader.

The martial arts of China, Korea, Okinawa, and Japan eventually spread to the USA and Europe, and it is these four general "schools" of karate (in many, many different styles) and Japanese judo and ju-jutsu that are the predominant classical/traditional "Asian Martial Arts" with which Westerners have become most familiar.

I appreciate completely that what I have presented is far from a historical treatment of any merit. Please understand how difficult and complex it would be to come even close to answering your question with even 45-50% historical accuracy and completeness.

Fighting is as old as man himself. Forms, versions, theories, and styles of fighting arose wherever man himself arose, and - with not the slightest intention of being either vulgar or frivolous - providing a really solid answer to your question that even most experts would agree on (or could agree on!) would be as impossible as answering a similarly worded question on the subject of human sexuality.

I hope that my reply has at least been successful in conveying an idea of the magnitude of the subject of your enquiry.

It is always a sincere pleasure to contribute to your terrific forum!

Best regards to you and to your readers,

Brad

Professor Steiner's American Combato Site
Read More »

Professor Bradley J. Steiner - Bio






Ed. Note: Professor Bradley J. Steiner is a world famous expert in both strength training and the martial arts, (close combat self defense.) He is one of the most prolific strength training writers of all time and was one of my earliest inspirations and role models. I'm honored to now call him a friend. He has written numerous strength training articles for many of the leading magazines from the late 60's to the current day. He has also written several classic books on natural bodybuilding, powerlifting and strength training (as well as his numerous self defense publications.) His no nonsense, truthful and anti steroid philosophy are admirable. He is one of the very few martial arts/ self defense world leaders who "has it right" by advocating the importance of progressive strength training, (instead of foolishly ignoring the critical importance of strength in close combat self defense as most do.) Professor Steiner's American Combato Site


From the American Combato website below:

Has written over 30 published books.

Founder and GrandMaster of American Combato.

Professor Steiner is President and CEO of the International Combat Martial Arts Federation (ICMAF), an elite and prestigious organization of internationally recognized close combat, self-defense, and martial arts authorities.

Former President of the International Stick and Knife Fighting Association in Berlin, Germany.

Former Washington State Director of the American Society of Law Enforcement Trainers. (ASLET)

He has written in numerous magazines including; American Handgunner, Combat Handguns, Security Soldier of Fortune, Cavalier.

He has taught special agencies and teams in the art of Combato. These teams also have specially written manuals created by the Professor.
Read More »

Friday, May 8, 2009

Farmer's Walk Around The Block at WST

Read More »

Thursday, May 7, 2009

Building Strength While Reducing Bodyfat Percentage - By Steve Baldwin

QUESTION:

Hi Steve, I am 40 years old. 6'3" 250 lbs. I would like to gradually get down to about 220 lbs. My present routine is as follows:

Monday
Trap Deadlifts 1 x 405 x 4-8 reps
Seated Rows 1 x 315 x 4-8 reps
Reverse Chins 1 x bw + 45 x 4-8 reps

Thursday
Bench Press 1 x 315 x 4-8 reps
Trap Military 1 x 185 x 4-8 reps
Parallel Dips 1 x bw +45 x 4-8 reps

I am not doing any cardio. I have cut my calories. Any suggestions?

ANSWER:

Hey John...Thanks for the question. You have a very good level of strength.

That's great! An excellent goal for you might be to try to maintain or even better increase your present level of strength while you reduce to 220. I have a client who has lost 40 lbs (202 to 162) since the second week of October (17 weeks). During the same period he has dramatically increased his strength in all the major lifts. I would estimate that he gained approximately 10 lbs of lean during this period. So the net effect of his efforts is more on the order of 50 lbs.

His routine is similar to yours in that it is based around getting stronger on basic compound exercises. His routine differs from yours in that he does specific work for areas that I feel need emphasizing (low back, neck, hamstrings, external rotator cuff muscles, calves, posterior shoulders etc.)

While specifically working these areas is not essential to becoming stronger, I feel that it is justifiable to emphasize them to ensure balanced development in an attempt to avoid injury. Progression on the basics is the bottom line. You must stay injury free to optimally progress. I don't think that adding assistance work to address these areas is going to lead to overtraining for most people.

I believe in doing a moderate amount of cardiovascular activity (3 times per week/30 minutes per session) per week for general health and to help promote leaness over time. Again if done correctly I don't think this amount of work will result in overtraining.

As far as nutrition goes, my client (31 years old) consumed five 4 hundred calorie meals per day with an emphasis on complex carbohydrates, moderate protein and relatively low fat. I hope this helps and I hope you reach your goals.

Sincerely, Steve

QUESTION:

Dear Mr. Baldwin, I just turned 40 in July and was wondering if you could recommend a good routine for me to continue to get strong. I am about 5'10" and 200lbs. I've been lifting for around 17 years. I can no longer lift 5 days a week for my recovery time is not the same any more. I want to get stronger and add some more cardio time to my routine to improve my cardiovascular shape without doing so much I lose some strength.

Thank you,
Bill Getchell

ANSWER:

Hello Bill... Thanks for writing. Your gym sounds fantastic (the gym Bill trains at has a power rack, dumbbells up to 110 lbs., and a lot of Hammer Strength machines). Bill, you might consider strength training twice per week using an A and B workout. I like the following program:

WORKOUT A - WORKOUT B
Full Barbell Squat - Leg Press
Leg Curl - Hip & Back machine
Toe Press - Seated Calve Raise
Dumbbell Bench Press - Standing Barbell Press
Chin - Machine Pullover
Machine Shrug - Machine Row
External Rotation - Rear Delt Raise
Crunch - Dumbbell Side Bend
Neck Work (Posterior) - Neck Work (Lateral)
Forearm Work - Forearm Work

I like to change rep goal ranges for my clients every few weeks. You might consider something like this;
High rep phase - lower body - 15-20 reps
(4 weeks) upper body - 12-15 reps

Medium rep phase - lower body - 12-15 reps
(4 weeks) upper body - 10-12 reps

Low rep phase - lower body - 10-12 reps
(4 weeks) upper body - 7-9 reps

Take each set to muscular failure and strive for personal records at the end of each respective goal range phase.

Three 30 minute (moderate intensity) cardiovascular workouts should compliment the above just fine. The total strength and cardiovascular work for the entire week should take about 3 hours. Of course if your strength and cardiovascular levels do not improve to your satisfaction there are a lot of options for modifications. Good luck with your workouts.

Regards, Steve


QUESTION:

Mr. Baldwin, I currently train with weights about once every 5-7 days. My workout consists of squats, nautilus pullovers, db presses, and nautilus lower back. I try to add in two aerobic workouts a week. After months of experimenting with this capacity I think this is what my body can handle. If I add more work either to my weight workout or in the week, I tend to run down, get sick,...A lot of folks in the gym tell me my workload isn't great enough. What do you think? Thanks.

Joe


ANSWER:

Hi Joe ---- I think your basic workout plan is great. The squat, pullover and press are some of the hardest exercises to do and consequently some of the most productive.

Regardless of what your gym buddies say, the bottom line is your rate of improvement. If you continually add weight and reps (in perfect form) to those basic exercises you should enjoy excellent results.

If you get bored or stall using one workout you might alternate an A and B workout. Your present workout does not provide any work for your biceps and forearms. Some form of upper back work (chins, rows, lat pulldowns) would address this.

I would also provide work for the posterior shoulders (rows), external rotator cuff muscles, hamstrings and neck (some of the information in the above two answers should be applicable to you also). I don't think working these relatively small muscles will retard your progress. If you find it too much to do all of these every workout you can alternate assistance moves every other workout. I hope this is helpful.

Best of luck in your training,

Steve
Read More »

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

UNIQUE TRAINING TIPS FROM DR. KEN - By Steve Baldwin

Originally posted on NaturalStrength.com on June 20, 1999

In 1974 IronMan Magazine published an article by a young Ken Leistner detailing the strength training programs that his football trainees were using. The article emphasized high repetition squats and hard work on a relatively brief program. This type of training appealed to me. I always felt a sense of satisfaction and accomplishment upon completing a high rep set of squats or deadlifts. After a hard high rep set of hip and thigh work my workouts had to be brief and relatively infrequent. Training in this manner (especially when one trains alone) the trainee has to be extremely motivated. Through the years Dr. Ken's articles and unique ideas helped to inspire me to maintain this difficult regimen of training.

Dr. Ken is surely the most prolific writer in modern Iron Game history. I would venture to guess that he has written over 1000 articles for strength publications such as Powerlifting USA, The Steel Tip (his own newsletter from the mid-eighties), Muscular Development, Hard Gainer, HIT (Hard Training), Milo, Dino Files and others. His hard hitting, tell it like it is writing style is refreshing.

In this article I'm going to write about a few of my favorite training tips that Dr. Ken has written about over the years. I might have modified some of the techniques but the original suggestions came from Dr. Ken's articles.

50% SETS
This method involves selecting a weight for a particular exercise that will allow the performance of 10-12 reps to absolute failure with good form. Rest exactly 1 minute and do a second set to absolute failure with the same weight. The majority of trainees will fail on the second set with approximately one half of the number of reps completed during set one. Strive to exceed 50% during set 2 while maintaining perfect form.

10-10-10 SETS
This is a technique that I might have changed. I can't find the original article but this is the way I do it now. Select a weight that will allow you to complete 20 reps in perfect form. Perform 10 reps and rest exactly 1 minute. Complete your second round of 10 reps and again rest exactly 1 minute. During the third bout aim for 10 reps in good form. Of course if you have anything left push on to failure. For most people set 3 will be a difficult challenge to reach 10 reps. What you are doing in effect is taking a weight that will allow 20 good reps. Instead of pushing for 20 consecutive reps you are aiming for 30 reps with 2 rest intervals. This technique provides variety and a nice psychological change of pace from pushing each set to the absolute limit.

FIFTY REP SETS
Your editor has written about and utilized this method extensively. I really like this method for the Hammer leg press (one leg at a time). Simply select a weight that will allow the performance of approximately 25 good reps. After completing as many reps as possible hold the weight out at leg's length. Rest 15 seconds while breathing deeply and then continue on in subsets until 50 reps are completed. This is extremely tough and I would only use it as a change of pace challenge on an infrequent basis. A typical set might consist of 25 reps followed by 8, 6, 5, 3, and 3 for a total of 50 reps.

NEGATIVE LEG PRESS
These are an old favorite of mine. Again a little goes a long way. These can be very intense so just use these on a very infrequent occasion. They are also very effective. I'll have a trainee do a hard one leg set on the Hammer leg press (approximately 20 reps on each leg). I'll give them a short break and then load another 25-30% more weight on the movement arm. I'll help them lift the weight to leg's length then have them lower the weight very slowly (8-10 seconds per rep) initially. The set is terminated when the trainee cannot maintain a 3-4 second negative. The trainee must constantly breath in pants during each rep and strive to touch the movement arm to the rubber stop at the bottom as lightly as possible. It is surprisingly easy for the spotter to help the trainee lift the weight back to leg's length for another rep. I caution the trainee not to squeeze the handles and remind them to breath rhythmically throughout the set. The trainee should strive for 6-8 good reps.

FOREARM SPECIALIZATION
This requires setting up 3 stations so the trainee can move from one to another immediately. Work one arm at a time starting with the left. Start with the seated Hammer gripper (any other gripper will work). Utilize a weight that will allow approximately 15 good reps. After completing the gripper move as fast a possible to kneeling reverse shot wrist curls. Kneel at the side of a bench with the forearm resting palms down across the bench.

The hand and shot hang off the edge of the bench. Start with a 6 or 8 lb. shot for these and go to absolute failure. And then move to anvil pounds to complete the series. Grasp a standard rubber mallet in the left hand and strike the anvil as many times as possible in 1 minute (strive for over 100 strikes). The rubber mallet will tend to rebound. Maintaining a tight grip on the mallet requires intense concentration and it will work the hands and forearms in a unique manner. Make sure the mallet does not twist excessively or it could fly out of your grasp. Repeat the above sequence for the right arm.

The above techniques are just some of my personal favorites. It would require a book to cover all the creative and innovative training methods that Dr. Ken has written about over the last 25 years.


SEE STEVE'S OTHER ARTICLES IN THE WAY BACK ARCHIVES
Read More »

Steve Baldwin - Biographic Summary

Steve is the president of JUST STRENGTH TRAINING, in Memphis, Tennessee, one of the best personal strength training businesses in the country. Steve has over 40 years of avid participation in strength training and has competed in both Olympic and Powerlifting.

Steve holds an M.S. Degree in Fitness and Wellness as well as ACSM and NSCA certifications. As a private strength coach he has supervised over 30,000 strength workouts. Steve is a good honest guy and a friend of mine. I greatly respect his knowledge. He was also a moderator (and did a great job) on the old Physical Culture board too. Listen to him; Steve will give you good solid advise you can take to the bank.
Read More »

TRAINING AND EATING IN THE BIG APPLE - By Bob Whelan

Reprinted with permission of Hardgainer, Vol. 8, No. 3 (November-December 1996)


I arrived at Penn Station in New York City and walked to the corner of 34th and 8th to meet “The Human Wall,” (6’4’’, 310-lb) Drew Israel. We both had a great time when Drew visited my place, in Washington, D.C. (See Drew’s article in issue #44.) Now it was time for round two.

Just like clockwork, at 11:15 am, a car came by close to the curb and the door popped open. It was Drew. It was a good thing that the train was not late. I jumped in, and we were off to eat a pre-workout lunch at the Dixie Pig, one of Drew’s and Dr. Ken’s favorite places to eat. The place is not fancy, and not in one of New York’s better neighborhoods, but the food is great and the portions are huge.

After lunch it was off to Drew’s apartment/gym. We talked training and watched a few training videos while waiting for our food to digest. I had to sit between two Hammer machines to see Drew’s TV which is mounted high on the wall above another machine. Drew has a large training video collection featuring high-intensity workouts and lectures from top strength coaches. We watched “Strength Training by the Experts” and “Dr. Ken at West Point.” We were really fired up to train! Since we were planning to visit Dr. Ken at Iron Island Gym tomorrow, I made damn sure we did all of our training today at Drew’s.

Drew initially called me a few years ago after my article in Hardgainer issue #32 that described my living conditions at the time. I had literally lived in a gym for several years. Drew didn’t think there was a nother guy as crazy as he was. We had an immediate bonding and have been good friends since. I have since moved my gym into a commercial space, but Drew is still living in his gym.

Drew’s gym is an awesome display of dedication and passion for training and the Iron Game. It is a basement studio apartment in a nice Queens neighborhood. He has a bed in the corner, and a bathroom, which are the only two places where equipment is not taking up the entire space. (Later that night I slept on the floor between the Hammer Iso-Lateral Leg Press and Pullover machines. I felt right at home!) Drew has more machines and equipment than some large commercial gyms have. The machines and equipment are packed side by side, many actually touching each other. You have to contort your body just to move around the room.

The Training

We were now ready to train and this time I went first. Drew had me start with the Hammer Chest Press and, after warmups, I did sets of 325 for 8 reps, and 370 for 5 reps. I felt strong and was going to try 400. I took about two minutes rest as this would be a personal record for me, and I wanted it. Drew was yelling encouragement but his shouts faded into the background as my concentration grew intense. I felt good. This was it! Bam! It went up about three quarters of the way. I hit a slight sticking point but kept pushing. I rammed it through to lockout. A new PR! No matter what happened during the rest of the workout, I would be happy about this one.

The next movement was on the Tru-Squat® machine from Southern Exercise (800-348-4907). I have heard good things about this machine but had never actually had a workout on one. Let me tell you that it was brutal. This is a fine piece of equipment that makes you squat with perfect form. It takes all the stress off your lower back and is as hard (or harder) than free-weight squats. I will get one of these machines in the future. After warmups I did 20 reps with only 200 lbs and it was murder! The poundages on this machine do not correlate with free-weight squats as I’ve done 380 x 20 in the barbell squat. After completing the twentieth rep I felt sick and had to rest a few minutes.

I felt okay after a few minutes and went over to the Hammer Pullover machine. I did a couple of high-rep sets to failure and then weaved my way outside to Drew’s driveway where he does his free-weight exercises. There is no room for free weights inside his apartment. Drew has a garage with a bench for bench presses, a lot of free weights, Trap Bar, and other equipment. Trap bar deadlifts, military presses, bench presses, etc., are done in the driveway, even in January! Seated military presses were next in my workout. After warmups I did a set of 8 reps with 190 lbs, and then 210 for 5 reps. I quickly moved back inside Drew’s apartment to the Hammer Pulldown and did a few high-rep sets to failure with 180. Workout over! I was still feeling the effects of the Tru-Squat machine.

Now it was Drew’s turn to battle the iron. Drew’s first exercise was the Hammer Iso-Lateral Leg Press and, after warming up, he did 3 sets of 10 with 550! He lowered the weight slowly and did not bounce at all. An awesome display of strength. After a short rest it was over to the Hammer Chest Press. After warmups Drew did a set of 10 with 380 lbs. When Drew goes all-out to failure he really is at true failure. He looks like he is having a seizure on his last rep!

Drew quickly moved over to the Hammer Pullover machine, his favorite upper-body movement. After warmups he did a gut-busting set to failure with 250 lbs for 15 reps. Drew scraped and contorted himself through the machines and made it to his driveway for seated military presses. After warming up he took 235 lbs for 6 reps, then collapsed. He laid on the grass near the edge of his driveway for a few minutes, before getting up. I was feeling a lot better by now, but we waited a little while for Drew to regain his senses. You can tell when Drew is feeling good because he talks about eating. After about ten minutes Drew began ranting about Peter Luger’s Steakhouse (“Petah Loogiz” in New York dialect).

The Eating

I was really looking forward to visiting what Drew calls “the best steakhouse in the world,” in the Williamsburg area of Brooklyn. This is an area where you would not walk alone after 5 pm. It is a famous place, known for its huge portions of beef and has been an institution since 1887. It is also one of Dr. Ken’s (and the Iron Island gang’s) favorite places to eat. Two of Drew’s training partners, 6’ 260-lb Jim Duggan, and 6’3’’ 260-lb Howard Menkes, were going with us. Jim is well known in the New York area but is one of the best kept secrets in the Iron Game. He is one of the strongest drug-free guys in the world. Howard is a strong man in his own right and a big advocate of hip-belt training. He has got great results with it after a back injury. We were soon on our way. The car had tough springs as it carried about 1,000 lbs.

When we got to Peter Luger’s we were seated but were rubbing shoulder to shoulder. We had to pull the table a few feet from the wall, which caused a stir. We had to sit straddling the legs of the table so we would have room to move and breathe. There is no menu. It is simply steak for one, two, three, etc. We each ordered steak for two. The four double platters covered the table and there was little room for the bread and side orders. Everyone was staring at us and seemed to be wondering, “Who are those guys?” The steak was great and really hit the spot, especially after a good workout. Drew finished off two baskets of bread, a few side orders, and dessert. I learned a lesson from our last meeting: Do not try to match Drew with a fork or you will regret it! As we were leaving, the manager came over to us and said, “It’s been a long time since four guys have come in here and all finished their double steaks!”

After we got back to Drew’s place we were both looking forward to a good night’s sleep. I crawled between the leg press and pullover machines, and slept like a rock.

Iron Island Gym

Th next morning we got up late and all Drew talked about was having lunch at La Palma, a good Italian place. We had a great lunch there and Drew put on a show consuming enough veal parmesan for three people. We then set off on our way to “The Mecca,” Iron Island Gym.

When we first got there, I thought it looked small from the front view, due to the store front entrance. Once I walked inside, however, I saw how the place spread out behind the entire row of stores and went back about a block. The place is huge!

When I first walked in, I genuflected. I felt that I was in a sacred place, a place where many great battles have been fought with the Iron. The place was buzzing with enthusiasm and there were people training hard everywhere I looked. It is a hardcore but friendly place, not at all like the typical bodybuilding gym. The walls are covered with pictures and Iron Game memorabilia. It has every type of machine you could imagine, a large powerlifting area, and a graveled area behind the gym where large wheelbarrows and wagons are filled with Olympic plates. You are harnessed to them, and pull them like a mule over the bumpy sand and gravel surface. There are many other unique items there like the lead-filled torpedo cases with welded handles, to use for trhe farmer’s walk, the canon balls, two custom-made 90-lb Trap Bars, dumbbells with 2 1/2-lb jumps all the way to 200 lbs, and many other unique items.

Dr. Ken has his own custom-made 45-lb plates that are a light purple color (Iron Island Purple) and have IRON ISLAND in white letters that go around the inside of the plates. Drew brought a few of these plates down to my place during his visit. One thing that you will notice right away about Iron Island Gym is that it is extremely neat, with every item in its proper place. There are no plates laying on the floor, and plates are not even left on the equipment after use. Ken has his members trained to put all plates back on the plate racks after they finish their last set on any exercise. They all do it.

Meeting Dr. Ken was great. I spent some time with him in his office and we talked training. I had a great time. I picked up a good training tip that I’ve applied to my program. It’s the fifties day. Dr. Ken has written about this in The Steel Tip (reprinted in Hardgainer #44), and Drew uses it in his program. It is not a way to train all the time, but for a change of pace, once or twice a month. I have a new tradition at Whelan Strength Training where everyone’s first workout of every new month is fifties day. I pick four or five of the most demanding exercises and the workout’s objective is to get 50 reps in each exercise. I do it slightly different than Ken and Drew. I load the bar (or machine) to a weight only slightly lighter than what would normally be used for a set of 10 reps. The client then has to go to failure sevearl times to get to 50 reps. I usually have them do two exercises back to back. They must keep going back and forth until 50 reps of each exercise are done. It is brutal! And it is especially brutal if the exercise selections are the squat (or Trap bar deadlift), bench press, Hammer Iso-Lateral Leg Press, and Hammer Pulldown.

Another good tip I picked up from Dr. Ken is the use of the half-hour workout. I now offer both half-hour and full-hour workouts to my clients. This past year I’ve added five Hammer Strength units to my gym and this makes life a lot easier and faster. I can “clock” someone in 30 minutes or less now because changing plates is a breeze. When I had only free weights I’d spend at least 15 minutes in any workout changing plates and moving bars and benches around, and in and out of the power rack, etc. Also, a lot of good, tough, young (but broke) guys wanted to sign up with me but couldn’t afford the hourly rate. They can now train with me using the half-hour workout option. The shorter workout is just as tough as the hour one, and perhaps even tougher because get little if any rest between sets.

I had a great time in New York, and Iron Island Gym is a must-visit place for all Iron Game fanatics. But soon it was time to head to the train station and catch the train back to Washington. After saying farewell to Ken and Drew I told them I’d be back for another visit, when I attend the Oldetime Barbell and Strongmen Association meeting in October. Then we will have Peter Luger’s Round Two. I can’t wait!
Read More »

Sport Psychology In The Weightroom: Establishing a Foundation - By Fayyadh R. Yusuf, Ph.D.

Originally posted on the old NaturalStrength.com site on March 1, 2001


In a recent conversation with an N.F.L. running back I was asked if my job as a sport psychologist was "dealing with players who have mental problems?". Based on his tone, I suspected he equated "psychology" with an extremely negative connotation and wanted to put that perception to rest immediately. "No," I responded. "The players I work with don't have 'problems' so much as they're not fulfilling their true potential. My job is helping them overcome any hurdles that may be preventing them from playing great all the time."

This response was good enough to peak his interest and open a line of communication between the two of us. In addition to wanting a resource to bounce his thoughts off of, he wanted my professional opinions on these same matters. By our times end, he seemed interested in the benefits a sport psychologist could provide to an athlete in the N.F.L. The thing he realized is that competition is 90% mental, so retaining a specialist who can help him develop this area is no different than working with a strength or position coach.

In most cases, good coaches address the psychology of performance as part of their athletes' preparation. But sometimes the athlete can't confide in the coach or the coach doesn't possess the necessary knowledge to help. That's where I would come in and offer my perspective. Having been asked to write articles for the NaturalStrength web site, I hope that my professional expertise on the mental side of sport will be a positive learning experience for you, the weight lifting enthusiast.

As of this moment, my intention is to maintain a series of short articles which address issues I've deemed relevant to strength training--for both the coach and athlete. Including this article, I already have seven topics in mind. After that, I look to the readers for my inspiration.

For those of you wondering about my credentials, you may be interested to know that I have worked as a performance enhancement consultant, personal trainer, collegiate strength coach and researcher in the psychology of excellence for over five years. My educational background includes a masters degree in Sport Psychology and a doctorate in Evaluation. Currently, I develop mental programs (the way a strength coach develops lifting programs) for individuals wanting to maximize their mental acuity. My clients range from junior athletes to professionals in a variety of sports. While I don't profess to hold any "answers to life," I do hope that some of my thoughts prove valuable in your personal quests.

As with any client, whether they're involved in sport, the arts, business or even medicine, I begin with philosophy...

*****

Philosophy is simply the way we think about life (both personally and professionally). How we think is based on our perceptions of all the stimuli around us. For example, how do we react in times of distress? when things are going well? when no pressure is on us to do anything? Our instincts in all of these situations, and countless others, comes from our philosophy.

Everyone has a philosophy despite age or circumstance. The problem is that the vast majority of us fail to conduct a thorough self-evaluation of our thought patterns. Our attitudes, therefore, go unchecked, unchallenged and often times, underdeveloped. While I strongly believe that everyone has room to improve, some persons are fortunate to be raised with a great mind-set. But for the rest of us, it takes hard work to maximize our mental proficiency.

Philosophies are similar to physical traits in that our parents give us their tendencies. If their habits include seeing the positive in all situations, living a healthy lifestyle and working hard, then chances are good that their children will adopt a similar view. Other significant influences include teachers, coaches, friends, etc. who pass their philosophies on to us. This process starts when we are very young; children are able to absorb a surprisingly large amount of information even before they can clearly express themselves. And as the infant grows into a young adult, the values learned during the formative years become more deeply ingrained.

Again, this is similar to physical traits. As we grow older, our facial features, complexion, physical frame and hair often resemble some morphosis of our parents. Barring surgery, this development is inevitable. Changing our philosophical disposition, however, is very different in that regard. The beauty of our minds is that it is one of the few things we have total control over. Despite the manner in which we were raised, the power to change is within each of us--we are our own surgeons.

Of course, there is no real "cutting" involved in this procedure. Therefore, I prefer to think of mental training similar to physical training. With a prescribed plan of attack, diligence and patience, changes can be made naturally over time. But given my experience in both realms, let me assure you that the former is far more challenging. Pain thresholds may be an unavoidable factor to growing stronger, but those moments only last for a short period of time. The discomfort of changing attitudinal factors, on the other hand, is an on going process that demands attention 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Why? Because mentally, we are always active (even when "resting").

Interestingly, in my work and research exploring the philosophies of various performers, I've learned that the persons who excel at their professional lives generally hold the same values in their home life too. For example, during observations of a surgeon operating on his patients, I noted behaviors reflective of efficiency, tenacity and concentration. Later, I noticed the same demeanor while this same surgeon was playing tennis and cutting the grass. These are inner qualities which he possesses despite circumstance. Likewise, the head football coach of an N.F.L. team I've spent time with applies his spiritual convictions both at home and with his team. His religious convictions guide his everyday decisions at all times.

From a psychological perspective, it makes sense that these individuals excel in life because their minds are at ease. There are no conflicting "personalities" competing to make decisions; there is only one philosophy for any given situation. If this is the case for athletes in the weight room, then those who strive to get the tenth repetition of a set will apply equal resolve when challenged by complexities at school or work. But what does one do if the innate philosophy to achieve needs improving?

If you consider our quest for greatness a journey, than the process of getting better is never ending. Even for those few individuals who compete at the elite level (e.g. professional sports, multi-national corporations, etc.), there is room to get better. The key is knowing what areas require improvement.

Through appropriate self-evaluation we can assess philosophical strengths and weaknesses. Knowing strengths is integral because they serve as our weapons during difficult times. Finding weaknesses is equally important because they are the focal points of practices. In an athletic event, technical evaluations (e.g. strokes, footwork, blocking, etc.) are done through statistics and video analysis. We watch and count how many shots were made during a game, whether everyone was in proper position before a play, or other observable factors relative to playing well. Analysis of philosophical/mental performance can be performed in the same manner except that the focus is on "what were you thinking at this moment?."

Three things should stand out immediately about this process. First, it requires the subject (i.e. the athlete) to participate in his/her own evaluation. Second, the athlete must remember his/her thoughts of past events. And third, the athlete must trust the coach in order for honest communications to develop. The coach, in effect, merely facilitates this evaluation; he isn't the expert because he can't identify an athlete's thoughts. But once the deficiencies are revealed, it is the coaches (or sport psychologists) job to help guide the athlete in a direction that will improve his/her thoughts. If the coach happens to be the "subject", than s/he should seek outside means (e.g. people, literature, etc.) for developmental strategies.

There are numerous resources to learn from when attempting to improve our philosophical disposition. And thanks to the technological advances of the internet, many are relatively inexpensive. My favorite and thus far most reliable guidance comes from reading articles, biographies, and perspectives of persons who have excelled in their chosen endeavors.

While reading this literature, I pay particular attention to the attitudes or thought patterns which emerge during the persons life. For example, how do they handle success? misfortune? injuries? Those aspects which I am comfortable adopting, I attempt to incorporate into my own life (and/or work). It's similar to the weightroom adage: "if you want bigger legs, then find the person in your gym with the biggest legs and do what he does." Imitation is the way to go--assuming you're selective in the chosen qualities. In other words, one must be discriminating when choosing role models and their respective behaviors.

Another consideration to keep in mind is that it's impossible to retrace the exact footsteps another person has taken in their life's journey. You can't possibly meet the same people, experience the same events or feel their emotions. Although many people who excel in their chosen domain may share some philosophical beliefs fundamentally, everyone's journey is unique--as is yours.

This sense of individuality is comparable to physical differences. Athletes who lift the same amount of weight or play the same position rarely look the same physically. Some quarterbacks are taller than others, some pointgaurds are quicker than others and some tennis players are stronger than others. So why can they all perform well in their respective sports? Because they know how to maximize their abilities by being strong in mind.

When it comes to the weightroom, coaches and athletes must have a great philosophical foundation from which to begin their training. Their mental habits will determine how they deal with both successes and setbacks during lifting sessions. So to get the most out of themselves, it's imperative that they recognize their mental habits. Those that inhibit progress should be weeded out while emphasizing those that promote success.

Exercise:

In order to assess your philosophy, take several weeks to address the following situations. Someone who knows you should do the same during that period. At the end of the established period (e.g. 3 weeks) compare answers.

*describe X's disposition (physical and mental characteristics) when things are going really well in the weight room. cite specific instances/examples.

*describe X's disposition (physical and mental characteristics) when things are going really poorly in the weight room. cite specific instances/examples.

*describe X's disposition (physical and mental characteristics) when things are going really well outside of the weight room. cite specific instances/examples.

*describe X's disposition (physical and mental characteristics) when things are going really poorly outside of the weight room. cite specific instances/examples.

*what is X's attitude toward strength training in general?

*in order of degree (highest to lowest), describe three of X's strengths. cite specific instances/examples.

*in order of degree (highest to lowest), describe three of X's weaknesses. cite specific instances/examples.
Read More »

Monday, May 4, 2009

DINOSAUR WOMEN - By Bob Whelan

Reprinted with permission of Hardgainer, Vol. 8, No. 4 (January-February 1997)

It was a steamy early-September Saturday in Washington, D.C., and it would be hard not to break a sweat. I glanced at the day’s schedule and noticed that I had a great lineup of hard workers coming in, and most of them were women! Overall, about one third of my clients are women and they all train hard. They are tough and not looking for any mercy. (And they don’t get any.) They hate toning; they want to get strong. They are tired of being underestimated. They want to kick ass and take names! I train them the same as the guys, and they love it. As Charlene McNamara puts it, “Women are tired of being babied!”

I was fired up and really looking forward to getting “in the trenches.” I eagerly prepared for the day’s coming battles. I filled all the water bottles and put them in the fridge, turned on all the fans, and then got the day’s training logs ready. I put a US Marine Corps cadence tape in the stereo and upped the volume. We were ready for war, with women at the front lines!

All-out Effort!

First in would be Andrea Rippe. Andrea is 27 years old, 5’3’’ and about 134 lbs. She is tough, hard working, motivated and is stronger than most men her size. She is hardcore and wouldn’t be caught dead wearing lifting gloves! I put her on the Stairmaster for five minutes to elevate her core body temperature, and then had her do a few minutes of 20-second static-hold stretches. While she was doing this, I pre-loaded all the bars and Hammer machines so we could blast through the workout with minimum delay.

We started things off with the bench press. After warmups we progressively added weight for the first two sets, done to failure, and Andrea completed her last set of 3’’ monster-bar bench presses, going to failure on the eighth rep with 130 lbs.

Next was the Hammer Iso-Lateral Row with custom-made 2’’ handles. Andrea put some chalk on her hands and then went through a killer breakdown set of 110, 90 and 70 all done to high-rep failure. She only got enough rest for me to strip off the plates and it was go again. Her rear delts, forearms and lats were “cooked.”

Next was the deadlift with my Sutherland giant 100-lb Trap Bar with thick handles. After warmups, it was loaded to 175 lbs and Andrea took it to failure doing 19 reps. She had to lean against the Hammer Iso-Lateral Behind Neck Press machine to stay on her feet, and was breathing so hard that she could probably be heard on the next floor!

Next was the Hammer Pulldown for 3 sets of 10 with 80 lbs, and then it was over to the Hammer Iso-Lateral Behind Neck Press with a breakdown set of 80, 60 and 40, with each set going all out to failure. Her shoulders were smoking! I had her get right up for some manual resistance shoulder work, which made her scream. The place sounded more like a slaughter house than a gym! I let her take a minute’s rest to drink some water.

The next movement was standing reverse curls with a 2’’-diameter bar, and Andrea did 3 sets of 10 reps with 50 lbs. Then it was over to the Hammer Iso-Lateral Leg Press. She pounded out 2 sets of 20 with 190 lbs with a dead stop pause on every rep. No bouncing allowed! After the last set of leg presses she was very wobbly. I let her take a two-minute rest so she could complete the workout. The “main meal” was over and now it was time for “dessert.”

I grabbed the 2’’-diameter wrist roller that has a 15’-long rope, and we headed to the stairway banister. There is no air conditioning in the stairway and where Andrea was standing was like a sauna! After a few 15’ reps she was “fried” and drenched in sweat. Her forearms and 14’’ arms were swollen and gorged with blood. She was breathing like a freight train and struggling to suck in enough air to stay on her feet. She was determined to finish strong and not be KOed. She was soon ready to accept today’s final challenge.

At a bodyweight of only 134 lbs she was about to do battle with the 175-lb sandbag, to put the finish on a brutal one-hour high-intensity workout. If she got it, she would be the first woman to transport 175 lbs of sand all the way around the tough course.





Andrea loves the sandbag carry exercise and even has her own sandbag at her house that she practices with. (She is also one of several clients that I’ve had call Brooks Kubik to jokingly “cuss him out” for introducing me to this torturous device!) She is currently one of only two women with her name already on the 150-lb bag, Charlene McNamara being the other. They have a friendly rivalry that motivates each of them to work even harder.

Women can get their names on the sandbag, and a free workout, if they can carry 150 lbs around the course in under ten minutes. They are not allowed to drag the bag or to put it on their shoulders. It must be “carried” in bear-hug fashion.

My clients frequently make bets with each other, usually offering to pay for a workout, to see who is first to get a certain poiundage around the course in less than the ten-minute time limit. The time limit can make things interesting indeed!

A few months ago Charlene McNamara made a (workout) bet with Vern Veldekens that she would get 150 around in under ten minutes before Vern could get 225 around. Since clients can train on different days, the rule is that they have to match the bet on their very next workout to tie, or else they lose. Vern took the bet and, unexpectedly, Charlene got 150 all the way around the very next week. She immediately called Vern and really enjoyed giving him the news.

Vern had just got back from a month-long end-of-semester vacation, and was slightly out of shape. Since he had to do the sandbag carry at his very next workout, he looked doomed to lose this bet. But Vern was determined not to let Charlene beat him, and managed to get the 225-lb bag three quarters of the way around the course in quick time. But this great effort took its toll and when Vern collapsed, he could not even think of getting up for 7 minutes!

I warmed Vern of the time and he struggled to get up. He was operating on auto pilot and willed himself to get the bag to within 10’ of the finish line, before collapsing again. This time he was almost in a coma.

As the clock ticked away, it looked hopeless. I screamed, “Ten seconds, Vern. C’mon—finish it!” Somehow, Vern jumped up, grabbed the bag, took three big steps and then dove across the finishing line, bear-hugging the bag which landed on top of him as the clock ticked to zero! It was a tie and no one won the bet.

Vern stayed down on the floor for a long time and was breathing so hard that it sounded like a tornado, but he had a smile on his face. The first thing he did when he got up, twenty minutes later, was call Charlene.

I let Andrea rest for about three minutes to regain her strength and get her mind ready for combat. “C’mon Andrea, you made 150 look easy. Be the first woman to get 175. Let’s do it!”

Andrea attacked the bag and wrestled with it to get it into the clean position. She couldn’t quite lock her fingers around the bag, lost her balance and fell over backwards. She was okay, and we had a good laugh. Then she tried it again. Her whole body shook as she struggled to get the bag above her knees. She gave a great heave and screamed with concentrated anger at the bag! She finally had it where she wanted it, in a bear-hug position. This time, she managed to lock her fingers and began her walk around the third floor. She collapsed twice, each time requiring several minutes of rest to regain her sense. She managed to carry the bag more than three quarters of the way around the floor as the ten-minute time limit expired. This was a great workout and a tremendous effort. Andrea will soon get 175. It’s only a matter of time.

Muscle Fiber is Human

Charlene McNamara was next and she went through the same brutal one-hour workout that Andrea did, and ended up also trying to get the 175-lb bag around. She managed to get it about half of the way around, which was quite impressive since she almost killed herself when she got the 150.

Charlene is a hard worker and very competitive. The quickest way to get Charlene to do something is to tell her that she can’t. She is one of the most determined people I’ve met. She loves grip work and has an extremely strong handshake. She loves to crush men’s hands and make their eyeballs pop out! Ask Mike Thompson and Drew Israel about her vice handshake, as they both have met Charlene.

Stephanie Jirard and Rochelle Bratton are hot on the trail of Andrea and Charlene. They train extremely hard. In fact, most men have probably never trained as hard as any of them. It’s by word of mouth, but every week I get a new hardcore dinosaur woman come in who wants to train hard. It’s great!

Muscle tissue is not defined as male or female, but as human. The same principles of intensity and progression apply to training women as they do to training men. Women do not want to be babied! Women should not be embarrassed or afraid to develop strength or to maximize their physical potential. Toning is nothing more than low standards and surrendering to the norms of society. Toning is an inferior way to train with weights, and a growing number of women want nothing to do with it!



Read More »

Sunday, May 3, 2009

Sometimes Nothin's A Pretty Cool Hand - By Chuck Miller

Originally posted on the old NS site in 2001.


For those of you who might remember the classic film, Cool Hand Luke, the title of the article espouses the lead character’s philosophy of life. Luke bluffed his way to a big poker win and became the leader of his gang of prison cronies. What did Luke have in his hand? Nothin’! Oh no my friend, there’s where you’re dead wrong. Old Luke had something in his hand all right. He had the biggest ace of all up his sleeve - confidence. He knew he could fool that bunch of dopes, and with his attitude, success was nearly guaranteed.

Now, you can’t really fake your way in lifting, and I wouldn’t want you to anyway. You either have the strength to make the lift, or you don’t. But, my point is that many lifters have plenty of strength but lack confidence. Consequently, they create mental barriers and routinely miss lifts they should make easily. The muscle is already there, but the mind is not.

In addition, confidence extends beyond your belief in your ability to make one particular lift. It applies to your whole approach to training. Many lifters incorrectly see a missed lift as a sign that something is wrong with their training program. They then rush home and spend hours writing a new schedule, agonizing over details such as rest intervals, volume, exercise selection, etc. They decrease all their training weights to "get used to the new workout." Things go smoothly during the break-in period and the trainee brainwashes himself into thinking he has found the one system that will permit continual progress.

Guess what? As soon as the weights get heavy, he begins missing lifts and the panic sets in again. Oh, he may tough it out for a couple weeks, but it is only a matter of time until the program is scrapped and the process starts again. Maybe this is what they mean by "cycling." As former Houston Oilers coach Bum Phillips has said, "If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it." More than likely, the problem is not the workout; it’s the lifter. He’s not willing to work hard and be patient long enough to realize gains. Worse yet, he has no confidence or belief that basic, infrequent workouts can possibly work. This insecurity is not completely his fault. Newsstand muscle magazines have bombarded him with useless programs and advice. If you’re reading The Dinosaur Files, HardGainer, or some of the other lesser-known publications, at least you’ve managed to stumble onto a different message.

One of the best tools for gaining confidence is to cultivate a sense of perspective. By this I mean, try to see the big picture. What will really happen if you miss this lift? Will your wife leave you? Will your boss fire you? What will happen if you make it? Will Randy Strossen come beating on your door for a MILO cover shot? Will you take your winnings and retire to a life of leisure on the beach? Hell no! Either way, you’ll go home, take out the trash, and feed the dog. In the grand scheme of things, it really doesn’t matter. As a famous football player once said, "If the Super Bowl is so important, why do they play it every year?" Ah..., the burden is lifted. The weight of the world is removed from your shoulders and all that remains is that pesky little 600-pound bar. You are now free to drive it through the roof!

In addition to providing confidence, this sense of perspective will help you pace yourself for the journey ahead. You will go months with no progress at all. Despite using impeccable form, you will have injuries that limit your training. Family and work obligations will interfere with workouts. You won’t always get a good night’s rest or eat properly. Still, the grind must continue. As in a grueling 162 game baseball season, you have time to overcome these "slumps". You’ll even have hot streaks where everything is going right and all your lifts are increasing. But, I promise, they will be followed by these inevitable lulls. This is how it must be for success with the iron. You must pay your dues over the long haul.

Otherwise, everyone who touched a barbell would taste success. If it were easy to bench 400 pounds or squat 500 pounds, you’d see a hell of a lot more guys in gyms doing it. Perhaps then the allure of training wouldn’t be so great. After all, the true iron warrior relishes the challenge. He doesn’t want to lift weights any other sissy could lift. So, he piles weight on the bar that sits in that proverbial squat rack hidden in the corner of the gym while others scurry off to the triceps press-down rope. Those who persist and meet the challenge day after day for years on end will achieve seemingly unattainable goals.

But for every success story, there are hundreds of dropouts flapping away with 20-pound lateral raises. This is why you must maintain perspective. One workout, no matter how good or how bad, will not make or break your lifting success. While it is important to make each session the best it can be, you won’t set new PRs every time you enter the gym. If you bench pressed 300 pounds for five reps last week or last month, perhaps you will only make 3 or 4 reps on this night. Big deal, this is not the time to trash your whole program. It is the time to knuckle down - get a little more rest, eat a little better, focus a little more intensely. If you need to, back off for a week or two and make another run at this problem weight.

This way, you can tweak your program a bit without disrupting all the hard work you’ve invested. This journey is definitely not for the impatient or weak-minded. It is built upon years of hard work stacked in succession. So, the next time you approach a new max, doubting whether you have the strength to make the lift, step back and take a deep breath. Picture Luke with a twinkle in his eye and that carefree swagger. Nonchalantly he says, "I can eat 50 eggs."

If you make the lift, be humble. Take it in stride. Cool Hand Luke knows. He’s been around the block a time or two. The iron will win its share. If you miss, shrug it off and don’t allow your confidence to be shaken. Even the best defensive backs get beat for long touchdowns. This is not to imply that you take lifting lightly. You pulled on the bar ‘till they had to pry your hands away. That "never surrender" approach already confirmed your commitment. Just like Luke on the prison grounds, you took your beating and didn’t back down. Luke won George Kennedy’s respect with his toughness, and you pleased the Iron Gods with yours. Grimek, Cyr, Peoples, and the rest smile down in approval. There will be other days and other battles with the iron.

Next time, you’ll be better prepared. Your relentless drive to train will carry you through this plateau; it’s just a matter of when. That’s what progressive training is all about. You add weight to the bar when you can, building on past milestones. You don’t just walk in a gym and try to deadlift 500 pounds, having never even achieved 400. You build up to it over a long period of time, eventually hitting new records with 470, 480, etc. This way, when you finally get to 500, it’s only 10 or 15 pounds above your previous record. Now, you have past successes to add to your sense of perspective, which should boost your confidence even more. Yes, it may have taken 3 months to inch up that last 10-pound increment, but you made it; you persevered. The next 10 pounds will be conquered in much the same way. Hard work and patience will prevail, but you must understand the big picture to make this possible.

I’ll admit that you can’t go on forever like this. Time is the one battle no man really wins. But, you have many years in which to build. In fact, it is my firm belief that you’ll run out of desire before you run out of time. If you stay the course, you’ll lift weights you couldn’t have rolled across the gym floor when you started! Eventually, you’ll have had enough, and hopefully then you’ll pass on some of your knowledge to a wide-eyed beginner. But you’re not there yet so march your tail over to that squat rack, load up some weight, and start huffing like a steam engine.


Chuck below lifting the 250 pound Atomic Athletic granite stone at WST.





Confidence, perspective, and pace: three very important and interrelated mental tools in your lifting arsenal. Ignore them and you are likely to burn out quickly and suffer a frustrating exit from the Iron Game. Develop them and you are likely to have a long and fulfilling training career. And even on the days when you are feeling worst - when the tank is empty - don’t make excuses. Instead, remember someone you may know who did not stand a chance; someone who had the deck stacked against him, yet still summoned courage and confidence. Emulate that person. Then, maybe you too will have a day where nothin’ really is a cool hand.

Check out chucks website at www.purepower.iwarp.com
Read More »
Does modern bodybuilding make you sick? You should write for Natural Strength! I always need good articles about drug-free weight training. It only has to be at least a page and nothing fancy. Just write it strong and truthful with passion! Send your articles directly to me: bobwhelan@naturalstrength.com
BODY • MIND • SPIRIT

Vintage Bodybuilding Literature

Vintage Bodybuilding Literature
Oldtime Strongman Books

This site does not provide medical advice. We assume no liability for the information provided in NaturalStrength articles. Please consult your physician before beginning any exercise or nutrition program. Copyright © 1999-2026 NaturalStrength.com | All Rights Reserved.